lakers need boozer and marcus banks or sam I am to contend

lakerboy339 · by **lakerboy339** on Wed May 31, 2006 12:30 pm

some how we need to trade mihm, cook, mckie for boozer. we need to offer the mid level to banks, or cassel who ever bites. we do that, we should have 55 wins or more next year and we should compete for the ring. :jam2:

no_dont · by **no_dont** on Wed May 31, 2006 12:42 pm

yes. me would be happy

civilrage · by **civilrage** on Wed May 31, 2006 2:05 pm

here we go... dooooode we have like ten thread on this crap already. :bang:

LUUUKE · by **LUUUKE** on Wed May 31, 2006 10:10 pm

NB4

but i would be happy with boozer and banks

LakerBaker · by **LakerBaker** on Thu Jun 01, 2006 1:09 am

Well, we must remember we ended up getting Kwame instead by trading Butler, I like Banks and Cassell, but I think Cassell is a little too old, I would rather invest in Banks. But, I like the idea of Trading Mihm to move up in the draft to get Roy, that would be nice.

LUUUKE · by **LUUUKE** on Thu Jun 01, 2006 3:22 pm

LakerBaker wrote:Well, we must remember we ended up getting Kwame instead by trading Butler, I like Banks and Cassell, but I think Cassell is a little too old, I would rather invest in Banks. But, I like the idea of Trading Mihm to move up in the draft to get Roy, that would be nice.

yea..

banks can gaurd the great pgs of the west..

everyone seems to forget the PG position was our weak point..

Lakers#1fan · by **Lakers#1fan** on Thu Jun 01, 2006 5:07 pm

This could be a great deal for us

lakers need boozer and marcus banks or sam I am to contend

lakers need boozer and marcus banks or sam I am to contend

Who is online