Trade mihm and george for

kobe one kobe · by **kobe one kobe** on Mon Jul 24, 2006 6:01 pm

Wells would Queen bees take that trade

Barnstable · by **Barnstable** on Mon Jul 24, 2006 6:12 pm

Queens wouldn't trade with us to save there lives.

Danny Ainge · by **Danny Ainge** on Mon Jul 24, 2006 8:11 pm

how is this going to help us?

Kobe Bryant 8 · by **Kobe Bryant 8** on Mon Jul 24, 2006 9:04 pm

Danny Ainge wrote:how is this going to help us?

Wait, are you saying you wouldn't take Bonzi for Mihm and George?

nicehair911 · by **nicehair911** on Mon Jul 24, 2006 9:13 pm

I'd do it in a New York minute.

Crispy · by **Crispy** on Mon Jul 24, 2006 10:29 pm

bonzi wells is a really underrated player. but him and artest dont go well together. their games are too similar. if either kobe/lamar/wells could play pg, i would love this deal

Barnstable · by **Barnstable** on Tue Jul 25, 2006 12:47 am

I would love this deal if it went down, but the Queens would never make a move that would improve us that much.

SWOL · by **SWOL** on Tue Jul 25, 2006 10:09 am

BONZI NEEDS MORE SHOTS THAN THIS TEAM HAS TO OFFER, THAT IS TROUBLE WAITING TO HAPPEN

WHAT ABOUT A 3 WAY

BONZI TO CLEVELAND
HUGHES TO LA
MIHM AND FILLER TO SAC

Kobe Bryant 8 · by **Kobe Bryant 8** on Tue Jul 25, 2006 9:27 pm

Was I the only person who saw Bonzi completely destroy SA in the playoffs this year? His D was fan-f'n-tastic.

Barnstable · by **Barnstable** on Tue Jul 25, 2006 9:34 pm

Kobe Bryant 8 wrote:Was I the only person who saw Bonzi completely destroy SA in the playoffs this year? His D was fan-f'n-tastic.

Yeah, Bonzi doesn't seem like the type of player who needs to have a good offensive game to make an impact. His D is solid and if his offense isn't working for him, he just turns up his D.

Kept · by **Kept** on Tue Jul 25, 2006 10:31 pm

SWOL wrote:WHAT ABOUT A 3 WAY

BONZI TO CLEVELAND
HUGHES TO LA
MIHM AND FILLER TO SAC

I'm down.

8ebok · by **8ebok** on Wed Jul 26, 2006 8:51 am

Same here

Klewfish · by **Klewfish** on Wed Jul 26, 2006 11:06 am

Kept wrote:
SWOL wrote:WHAT ABOUT A 3 WAY

BONZI TO CLEVELAND
HUGHES TO LA
MIHM AND FILLER TO SAC

I'm down.

does Cleveland want Bonzi?

Arnie Spanier · by **Arnie Spanier** on Thu Jul 27, 2006 11:40 am

I rather have Bonzi than Hughes.

KB24 · by **KB24** on Thu Jul 27, 2006 12:24 pm

Arnie Spanier wrote:I rather have Bonzi than Hughes.

I would rather have Hughes because he could start at point guard. He is a decent defender, good size and versitile. The negative is his contract and injury prone body.

Arnie Spanier · by **Arnie Spanier** on Thu Jul 27, 2006 3:29 pm

KB8@CL wrote:
Arnie Spanier wrote:I rather have Bonzi than Hughes.

I would rather have Hughes because he could start at point guard. He is a decent defender, good size and versitile. The negative is his contract and injury prone body.

He sucks in the Playoffs. With The Wizards and the Cavs. Bonzi punks Bowen so I will take him.

Warriors&Lakers · by **Warriors&Lakers** on Thu Jul 27, 2006 5:14 pm

nicehair911 wrote:I'd do it in a New York minute.

is that reallly fast or really slow.

Arnie Spanier · by **Arnie Spanier** on Sat Jul 29, 2006 2:44 pm

Mihm and George to Philly for Dalembert and Carney

Satan · by **Satan** on Sat Jul 29, 2006 2:47 pm

That depends, can Bonzi breakdance?

cthroatgtr · by **cthroatgtr** on Sat Jul 29, 2006 3:13 pm

Bonzi is a SF in a SG body. Hughes is a SG in a PG body. Both could have roles in the triangle, but I think Hughes would be a better fit. Bonzi would occupy some of Kobe's touches in the post, though it would still work. Hughes would be a perfect triangle PG. Both Philly and GS tried him at the point, which didn't work because he doesn't have a PG mentality, but that would be ok with the Lakers offense, since Lamar, Luke and Kobe run the offense. Hughes is a very good on ball defender and quick enough to guard points. He is injury prone, but probably less at the 1 than the 2.

Trade mihm and george for

Trade mihm and george for

Who is online